What's Fresh
- In Grateful Memory
- Cheerleading is Hard?
- International Flush a Quran Day
- Flushed
- Villaraigosa on the cover of Newsweek
- Researchers Pinpoint Brain's Sarcasm Sensor
- If America Is Dead, Why Won't We Lie Down?
- Part 5 of 5: If I could be a doctor...
- Laura Bush Faces Protesters in Jerusalem
- The Hatching of a New Blog
In the Freezer
March 1990October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
October 2007
August 2008
September 2008
November 2008
August 2010
Other Tasty Places
Conservative Blogs- Captain's Quarters
- Cox & Forkum Editorial Cartoons
- Galley Slaves
- GayPatriot
- Hedgehog Report
- Hugh Hewitt
- James Lileks
- Little Green Footballs
- Neanderpundit
- NRO: The Corner
- NRO: Impromptus
- Polipundit
- Powerline
- Real Clear Politics
- Roger L. Simon
- Seraphic Secret
- Vodka Pundit
- Volokh
- The Western Word
- WSJ Opinion Journal: Best of the Web Today
Friday, May 27, 2005
Weird Science?
I'm not trying to open up the stem cell debate here at the coffeehouse, but when Andrew Sullivan says that "The female body disposes of countless such embryos" ("such" referring to "embryos that never make it to implantation in the uterus"), is there any chance he really means "unfertilized eggs" and therefore is really not talking about the same thing? - served up by Ralphie @ 1:48 PM
Comments:
<< Home
That's what I thought... But still, the comparison seems somehow inappropriate, because the embryons miscarried are frequently non-viable.
What he probably meant that most frequent miscarriages take place at such an early stage that they are not even known to have taken place sometimes...
Post a Comment
<< Home
